Help your factory understand problems and test better ways to work.
We build AI tools that spot defects, fit rush orders into the schedule, help chase down machine faults, and let you try a line change before you pay for it.
01Inspect the product
Teach the system what needs checking.
Show it approved parts and the spec. It flags what looks different, and your quality team decides whether it matters. We start with one product and one defect, tested on your own parts.
You can use this.
- Switch the example
- Show or hide the finding
- Situation
A housing off the line, at the same angle as the reference.
- Finding for review
- Next step for your team
Send it to quality review. An inspector decides before anything is reworked.
One reference photo isn’t enough. A real system needs representative samples, the right camera and lighting, and testing for missed defects and false alarms.
Give the quality team a specific finding to inspect.
02Plan the production
Turn changing orders into a workable plan.
Your planner asks in plain words. The AI reads the request, and a scheduling tool checks it against materials, machines and setups. The planner still picks.
“Can we fit an urgent order into tomorrow’s shift?”
- Material
- In stock
- Equipment
- Cell 1, fixture F2
- Setup change
- F1 to F2, 30 min
- Orders that move
- Depends on the sequence
Switch the option.
- Switch the sequence
Today’s plan
- 104206:00–08:00
- Setup F1 to F2, 08:00–08:30
- 104308:30–11:30
Sequence A
- Setup F1 to F2, 06:00–06:30
- 105106:30–07:30
- 104307:30–10:30
- Setup F2 to F1, added, 10:30–11:00
- 104211:00–13:00
1042 starts 5 h later · 1043 starts 1 h earlier · 1051 runs 06:30–07:30 · one extra setup
Cell 1 makes 120 housings an hour, set by its one inspection station. A fixture change takes 30 minutes. No breaks modeled.
- Situation
A rush order for 120 extended housings lands for tomorrow’s 06:00–14:00 shift.
- Result for review
Two sequences to compare. Neither is approved yet.
- Next step for your team
Your planner picks one and approves it. Only that plan goes to the floor.
See what a rush order pushes back.
03Investigate the problem
When a machine acts up, get the evidence in one place.
The assistant lines up sensor data, the manual and past work orders for the same machine over the same days. It suggests what might be going on and what would settle it. Your technician makes the call.
You can use this.
- Switch the explanation
- Open a source
Drive temperature 47 °C → 54 °C
Production load 59% → 77%
Production load also changed during this period.
Observed
Temperature and load both rose on day 8.
Possible explanation
The temperature change coincides with a change in load. More information is needed to determine the cause.
Needs confirmation
- Review applicable operating limits.
- Compare with previous operation under similar load.
- Technician confirms the next inspection.
- Situation
Operating temperature has increased. CD-1 is running hotter than it did two weeks ago.
- Finding for review
A supported investigation, with open questions. No cause confirmed.
- Next step for your team
Your maintenance lead decides what to inspect, by the approved procedure.
Fictional example. A hotter motor alone doesn’t prove a part is failing, and the assistant never touches the machine.
Help technicians decide what to investigate next.
04Test the change
Test the idea before changing the line.
Ask a what-if. The assistant turns it into a run on a simulation of your line, writes down every assumption, and shows you where parts pile up.
“What happens if we add a second inspection station?”
The assistant set it up as one extra station, everything else unchanged.
You can use this.
- Play or pause
- Replay from the start
- Move the time
Left: with a second station. Right: today.
- Packed in 10 minutes
- 1725
- Most parts waiting
- 60
- Bottleneck
- InspectionAssembly
Assumptions, the same for both lines
- Assembly: 20 s a housing, one station.
- Inspection: 30 s a housing per station, moving through the booth included.
- Packaging: 15 s a housing, one station.
- Conveyor at 15 m a minute, room for 4 housings before inspection. When it’s full, assembly holds its finished part.
- First in, first out. Each part goes to whichever inspection station can take it sooner.
- Both lines start empty and run 10 simulated minutes. Parts are always in stock and the new station is staffed.
- Situation
Parts pile up in front of inspection, and assembly sits holding finished housings.
- Result for review
Inspection can accept more work. Assembly now limits the line.
- Next step for your team
Check it with your real cycle times before you buy the station.
Illustrative simulation using simplified assumptions. It isn’t a validated model of a real factory or a live digital twin, and it isn’t connected to any equipment. A real study needs calibrated process data and engineering sign-off.
Know what the money buys before you spend it.
How we start
One process. One question. A testable result.
We sit down with your operators and engineers and pick one problem. A recurring defect, one cell’s schedule, one machine family or a change you’re weighing all work. Then we test the tool on your own examples before it goes anywhere else.
You decide what counts as good enough.
What would you like your factory to understand better?
A defect that keeps coming back, a schedule that won’t fit, a machine acting strange. Any of them is a good place to start.
Talk through a process